In high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), selecting the right stationary phase is critical for achieving accurate and efficient separations. C8 and C18 columns are two of the most commonly used options in reversed-phase chromatography. The "C" in these column names refers to the length of the hydrocarbon chains attached to the silica particles that form the column's packing material.
C8 columns contain octyl (eight-carbon) chains, while C18 columns have octadecyl (eighteen-carbon) chains. These chains affect column hydrophobicity, retention, and overall performance, making each column type suited for specific applications.
Retention and Hydrophobicity
C18 columns, with their longer chains, provide a higher number of hydrophobic interactions than the shorter chains in C8 columns. In theory, this should result in greater retention of non-polar analytes compared to C8 columns. However, as Chromatography Forum (CF) user Wayne Way points out, C18 does not always have greater retention than C8. Factors such as analyte properties and column packing also play a significant role.
“A high-loaded C8 could generate more retention than a low-loaded C18,” expands user philippem. CF expert moderator Tom Jupille agrees and remarks that having studied the PQRI column selectivity database generated by Snyder and Dolan, his conclusion was that variations in bonding chemistry and packing quality have a far greater effect than the length of the alkyl chain.
Peak Tailing and Active Site Interactions
Peak tailing, caused by interactions with residual silanol groups on the silica surface, is another consideration. Some CF users note that C8 columns may exhibit less peak tailing than C18 columns. User adam suggests that shorter retention times on C8 columns might reduce interactions with active sites, leading to improved peak shapes.
User philippem asserts that tailing depends on two key aspects—residual active site (Si-OH and acidic sites) and the column packing procedure. They explain that when using a pure reversed-phase mechanism and leveraging the correct chemistry, the active sites can be deactivated to avoid tailing. Proper column packing is also important in order to achieve a highly efficient column and symmetrical peaks, adds philippem. Their research results didn’t show a difference between C8 and C18 when the proper packing procedures were used.
Selectivity and Efficiency
The choice between C8 and C18 columns also comes down to the specific analyte. In some cases, a method using one column may be tried and tested, but experimenting with an alternative can yield positive results. In one example shared on CF, user dougs found that switching from a C18 column to a C8 column reduced run time from 28 minutes to just 9 minutes while maintaining effective separation between the analyte and degradant peaks.
Practical Applications and Considerations
The decision to use a C8 or C18 column depends on the unique needs of your analysis. As exemplified in several CF threads, it depends on what you’re separating and your goals. These points summarize some key factors to keep in mind:
- Analyte hydrophobicity: Highly hydrophobic compounds typically perform better on C18 columns, while moderately hydrophobic compounds may resolve well on C8. This assumes other key parameters, such as column loading, remain the same.
- Analysis time: C8 columns may reduce retention times and improve throughput for suitable analytes.
- Peak shape: Properly packed and conditioned columns minimize tailing, regardless of chain length.
By understanding the chemistries of each column type—and testing both during method development—you can optimize your HPLC methods for efficiency and reliability.
Chromatography Forum offers a space for analysts to exchange ideas and update their practices—join the conversation today.
